Skip to main content

Financial Illusions?

This post follows on from my previous ones on behavioural economics and neuroeconomics.  I have always been fascinated by optical illusions - you can find Shepard's two tables (see figure below) and other famous examples here.

 


two tables
© 1990 Roger N. Shepard



The question, of course, is whether we can be fooled / duped whenever it comes to making economic decisions.  Are there such things as financial illusions?  With regards to the recent housing bubble, were those who bought in the boom years duped by a financial illusion?  Did they really believe that houses would keep appreciating? Why did they pay such a high price for their house whenever the long-run link between house prices, income, and rental yields suggested that house were overpriced?

One possible alternative to the financial-illusion hypothesis is that they were purchasing houses with borrowed money and therefore didn't care.  In the US, for example, mortgagees can walk away from their houses and are not liable to repay their mortgages, unlike in the UK.  If they were required to make a low or no down-payment, then they will not care about what they pay for their house - in essence, they are gambling with other people's money.

Another possible alternative to the financial-illusion hypothesis is that there was a massive government-supported con which was used to redistribute income from the squeezed middle classes (whose main asset is their house) towards the financial and political elite. 

Popular posts from this blog

Bitcoin Bubble?

According to Robert Shiller , speaking at Davos, Bitcoin is a perfect example of a bubble - story here . Shiller sees Bitcoin as a backwards step in the evolution of money.   George Selgin , a free banker, takes an opposing view - click here .  Although he doesn't believe that Bitcoin is money, he sees its development as a fascinating turn in the evolution of money. In particular, he lauds the fact that Bitcoin production is constrained and cannot be infinite. There is a short video below where Bitcoin explain how it works.

How Valuable Are Connections?

Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Amir Kermani, James Kwak and Todd Mitton have written a paper on whether firms connected to Timothy Geithner benefited from these connections. They do so by looking at how stocks of these firms reacted to the announcement that he was a nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008. They find that there were large abnormal returns for connected firms. Below is the paper's abstract and the full paper is available here . The announcement of Timothy Geithner as nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008 produced a cumulative abnormal return for financial firms with which he had a connection. This return was about 6% after the first full day of trading and about 12% after ten trading days. There were subsequently abnormal negative returns for connected firms when news broke that Geithner's confirmation might be derailed by tax issues. Excess returns for connected firms may reflect the perceived impact of relying on the advice of a small ne

Boom and Bust: A Global History of Financial Bubbles

Boom and Bust: A Global History of Financial Bubbles, co-authored with my colleague Will Quinn , is forthcoming in August. It is published by Cambridge University Press and is available for pre-order at Amazon , Barnes and Noble , Waterstones and Cambridge University Press .