From tomorrow, the ECB will be applying a negative interest rate (-0.1%) to reserves held with it by European commercial banks (press release is here). Central banks typically pay no or a low interest rate on sums deposited with them by commercial banks. In normal times, there is usually a large opportunity cost associated with holding reserves at the central bank, but in the midst of financial turmoil, banks would rather hold reserves with the central bank than lend them out. In applying negative rates, the ECB is hoping that banks will begin lending to businesses and thus stimulate the EU economy, which is heading towards deflation. Neil Irwin at the NY Times has a nice blog post on the ECB's motives here.
Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Amir Kermani, James Kwak and Todd Mitton have written a paper on whether firms connected to Timothy Geithner benefited from these connections. They do so by looking at how stocks of these firms reacted to the announcement that he was a nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008. They find that there were large abnormal returns for connected firms. Below is the paper's abstract and the full paper is available here . The announcement of Timothy Geithner as nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008 produced a cumulative abnormal return for financial firms with which he had a connection. This return was about 6% after the first full day of trading and about 12% after ten trading days. There were subsequently abnormal negative returns for connected firms when news broke that Geithner's confirmation might be derailed by tax issues. Excess returns for connected firms may reflect the perceived impact of relying on the advice of a small ne...