The Free
Exchange column in a recent issue of the Economist examined the role of government in
the evolution of money – click here.
Karl Menger famously argued in his 1892 Economic Journal article that
money evolves organically without anyone inventing it and without government
intervention. In a lesser known paper,
Charles Goodhart argues for a cartalist view of the origin of money i.e.,
government plays a significant role in the rise of a monetary economy. The main implication of the Mengerian view is that government should get out of money. The main implication of the Goodhartian view is that fiscal and monetary matters are the concern of governments and the two should not be divorced as is the case with the euro.
According to Robert Shiller , speaking at Davos, Bitcoin is a perfect example of a bubble - story here . Shiller sees Bitcoin as a backwards step in the evolution of money. George Selgin , a free banker, takes an opposing view - click here . Although he doesn't believe that Bitcoin is money, he sees its development as a fascinating turn in the evolution of money. In particular, he lauds the fact that Bitcoin production is constrained and cannot be infinite. There is a short video below where Bitcoin explain how it works.