China is a fascinating country. Its rapid economic growth and transformation over the last few decades has been unprecedented in history. The big question for the world economy is can this growth continue? Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson argue that China must develop inclusive political institutions if it is to continue on this high-growth path. Others suggest that China's demographic time-bomb may operate to slow its growth. China's one-child policy, which has been operating for three decades, has resulted in an unbalanced population in terms of age and gender. However, this policy has also resulted in invasive state interference in the lives of women and families - click here to read a horrific account of the out-workings of the one-child policy. Can China's growth continue with such endemic oppression? Has such oppression been helpful to China's economic growth?
Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Amir Kermani, James Kwak and Todd Mitton have written a paper on whether firms connected to Timothy Geithner benefited from these connections. They do so by looking at how stocks of these firms reacted to the announcement that he was a nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008. They find that there were large abnormal returns for connected firms. Below is the paper's abstract and the full paper is available here . The announcement of Timothy Geithner as nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008 produced a cumulative abnormal return for financial firms with which he had a connection. This return was about 6% after the first full day of trading and about 12% after ten trading days. There were subsequently abnormal negative returns for connected firms when news broke that Geithner's confirmation might be derailed by tax issues. Excess returns for connected firms may reflect the perceived impact of relying on the advice of a small ne...