Skip to main content

China's Stock Market and Property Bubbles

I was visiting Shenzhen last week and during my visit I was speaking with alumni who work in the investment industry. The main topic of conversation was the huge increases in stock and property prices in China. The Shenzhen Index has doubled since January. The Shanghai Composite has increased 140% in a year. Jincheng Umbrella Holdings floated on the Hong Kong market in February and its shares are up 1700%!  Click here for a New Yorker piece on the Chinese stock market and here for a tongue-in-cheek piece by Tyler Cowen over at Marginal Revolution.

After speaking with alumni and after making comparisons with historical bubbles, it looks like China may be experiencing a simultaneous bubble in its stock and property markets. Here are five reasons why I think that China may be experiencing a bubble. 

1. Chinese stocks cannot be short sold and property by its nature cannot be short sold. Constraints on short selling have been common features of historical bubbles.

2. The People's Bank of China has been engaging in monetary stimulus and easing credit conditions. This makes it very easy for individuals to borrow to buy apartments and stocks. The rise of the shadow banking industry in China has also contributed to the the easing of credit conditions. Loose monetary and easy credit conditions have been associated with many historical bubbles.

3. The best performing stocks on the Shenzhen market are high-technology and e-commerce stocks. According to my sources, many of these companies have poor fundamentals and prospects. Notably, many historical bubbles have been associated with new technology. Indeed, the description of what is happening on the Shenzhen market reminded me of the dotcom bubble which burst in 2000.

4. There has been a notable increase in the stock-market participation rate, with many retail investors entering the stock market and many of them buying stocks on margin. This is reminiscent of the 1929 Wall St crash. Retail investors have also been borrowing heavily to invest in property, which is exactly what was happening in the West prior to the global financial crisis.

5. Taxi drivers in Shenzhen are giving investment advice on stocks and property. As Charles Kindleberger noted, one of the key warning signs that a  bubble is about to burst is when shoe-shine boys, bootblacks and waiters start giving stock tips.  

Source: New Yorker

Popular posts from this blog

The Economics of Global Warming

The Berkeley Earth Project , an independent study of global warming, has found that the earth has become a degree warmer over the past half century.  However, the statistical uncertainty surrounding pre-1920 estimates makes it very hard to say much about long-term trends - click here for graph .  This is one of my concerns with the global warming debate - we simply don't have trustworthy long-run data which looks at temperature changes over the last millennium (or two).  My second concern with the global warming debate is that it is very hard to prove any sort of casual link between global warming and human activity.  The scientists may be able to show correlation between global warming and our production of carbon dioxides etc., but correlation is not causation. My third concern with the debate is  that those who are sceptical or agnostic are stereotyped as flat-earthers or intellectually-challenged crackpots.  This only stifles debate and the progress of science itself. 

Boom and Bust: A Global History of Financial Bubbles

Boom and Bust: A Global History of Financial Bubbles, co-authored with my colleague Will Quinn , is forthcoming in August. It is published by Cambridge University Press and is available for pre-order at Amazon , Barnes and Noble , Waterstones and Cambridge University Press . 

The Failure of Herstatt Bank

As an undergraduate, I was taught about the failure of Herstatt Bank in 1974 and Herstatt risk. This bank was only the 35th largest bank in Germany at the time so why would anyone be interested in studying its failure? Herstatt failed because of its involvement in risky foreign exchange business. When it closed its doors on 26 June 1974, counterparty banks (mainly in New York) had not received dollars due to them because of time-zone differences - this is known as settlement risk. The cross-jurisdictional implications of its failure resulted in the Bank for International Settlements setting up the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and Herstatt's failure was a key reason for the establishment of real-time gross settlements systems, which ensures that payments between two banks are executed in real time. The Bank of England's Ben Norman has an interesting post on Herstatt over at the Bank's new blog ( Bank Underground ). As well as giving an excellent overview of