Skip to main content

Art and Money

What is your preference: Flemish baroque or French impressionism?  Rubens or Monet?  Even if you do not appreciate art, you may be interested to know whether or not art is a good investment over the long run.  Well to help answer this question, Christophe Spaenjers and his co-authors have recently published a fascinating paper in the American Economic Review, which looks at the relationship between art prices, the equity market, and income inequality over the long run – click here.  The most interesting findings are that there is a long-run relationship between returns on the equity market and art prices and that increases in income inequality result in higher art prices.  In other words, as the elite become wealthier they engage in conspicuous investment in and consumption of valuable and exotic assets, which bids up the prices of these assets. 


An earlier version of Christophe’s paper was presented in a seminar at the EFIRG at Queen’s University, and the paper uses an equity index constructed by myself, Qing Ye, Graeme Acheson and Charlie Hickson – click here for details.

Popular posts from this blog

Bitcoin Bubble?

According to Robert Shiller , speaking at Davos, Bitcoin is a perfect example of a bubble - story here . Shiller sees Bitcoin as a backwards step in the evolution of money.   George Selgin , a free banker, takes an opposing view - click here .  Although he doesn't believe that Bitcoin is money, he sees its development as a fascinating turn in the evolution of money. In particular, he lauds the fact that Bitcoin production is constrained and cannot be infinite. There is a short video below where Bitcoin explain how it works.

How Valuable Are Connections?

Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Amir Kermani, James Kwak and Todd Mitton have written a paper on whether firms connected to Timothy Geithner benefited from these connections. They do so by looking at how stocks of these firms reacted to the announcement that he was a nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008. They find that there were large abnormal returns for connected firms. Below is the paper's abstract and the full paper is available here . The announcement of Timothy Geithner as nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008 produced a cumulative abnormal return for financial firms with which he had a connection. This return was about 6% after the first full day of trading and about 12% after ten trading days. There were subsequently abnormal negative returns for connected firms when news broke that Geithner's confirmation might be derailed by tax issues. Excess returns for connected firms may reflect the perceived impact of relying on the advice of a small ne

Boom and Bust: A Global History of Financial Bubbles

Boom and Bust: A Global History of Financial Bubbles, co-authored with my colleague Will Quinn , is forthcoming in August. It is published by Cambridge University Press and is available for pre-order at Amazon , Barnes and Noble , Waterstones and Cambridge University Press .