My Corporate Finance class and I will begin looking at dividend policy tomorrow. Today, Aviva, the insurance giant, announced that it was cutting its dividend by more than a quarter. Subsequent to this announcement its shares fell 12.5% (story here). Why did Aviva shares fall so much? After all, the classic Miller and Modigliani irrelevance theorem suggests that a firm's dividend policy has no effect on the value of the firm. One explanation is that Aviva's managers were signalling to its shareholders that the future prospects of the company are not as good as was once thought. In a paper with Qing Ye and Wenwen Zhan, I find that dividends also played a very important information communication role is early capital markets.
Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Amir Kermani, James Kwak and Todd Mitton have written a paper on whether firms connected to Timothy Geithner benefited from these connections. They do so by looking at how stocks of these firms reacted to the announcement that he was a nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008. They find that there were large abnormal returns for connected firms. Below is the paper's abstract and the full paper is available here . The announcement of Timothy Geithner as nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008 produced a cumulative abnormal return for financial firms with which he had a connection. This return was about 6% after the first full day of trading and about 12% after ten trading days. There were subsequently abnormal negative returns for connected firms when news broke that Geithner's confirmation might be derailed by tax issues. Excess returns for connected firms may reflect the perceived impact of relying on the advice of a small ne...