Skip to main content

The Economics of Lying

One of the lead articles in last week’s Economist argued that “lying is at the heart of civilisation” and “lying is one of the things that makes the world go round”.  Think about it for one minute.  If lying was socially acceptable and prevalent, would contracting and economic exchange be even possible?  Would the very fabric of society not crumble?  We could trust no one – the government, doctors, business, our parents, our professors, our friends, and even our nearest and dearest.  Sadly, the prevailing postmodern and relativistic culture in which we live believes that there is no such thing as truth.  You can watch Os Guinness argue for why we need “truth” by clicking here.

In the City of London, there was once a phrase “my word is my bond”.  People in the City could be trusted – social opprobrium (and even jail) would be the result of someone caught lying and cheating.  Maybe the tolerance of lying and dishonesty has been at the root of recent financial chicanery in the City.  It certainly has been at the root of voter cynicism in Western democracies.  Expediency and “being economical with the truth” is the order of the day for the modern politician.  

As an academic, I am interested in truth and academia is all about the pursuit of truth.  Consequently, I disagree with the Economist – lying is not at the heart of our civilisation, rather its pernicious influence is contributing to the decline of our civilisation!

Popular posts from this blog

The CEO: The Rise and Fall of Britain's Captains of Industry

Michael Aldous and I had our book The CEO: The Rise and Fall of Britain's Captains of Industry published a few weeks ago. You can find out more about it and buy it at Cambridge University Press's website . It is also available at Amazon , Waterstones , and Barnes & Noble .  The CEO has already been reviewed in The Sunday Times , The Observer and Financial Times .

How Valuable Are Connections?

Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Amir Kermani, James Kwak and Todd Mitton have written a paper on whether firms connected to Timothy Geithner benefited from these connections. They do so by looking at how stocks of these firms reacted to the announcement that he was a nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008. They find that there were large abnormal returns for connected firms. Below is the paper's abstract and the full paper is available here . The announcement of Timothy Geithner as nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008 produced a cumulative abnormal return for financial firms with which he had a connection. This return was about 6% after the first full day of trading and about 12% after ten trading days. There were subsequently abnormal negative returns for connected firms when news broke that Geithner's confirmation might be derailed by tax issues. Excess returns for connected firms may reflect the perceived impact of relying on the advice of a small ne...

The Railway Mania

My colleague and former PhD student Gareth Campbell has created a website about the British Railway Mania - click here . This episode has been described by the Economist as probably the greatest bubble in human history. Gareth's website provides background on the Mania and posits some explanations for the 'bubble'. In his explanation of why the bubble happened, Gareth places a lot of emphasis on investor myopia regarding future dividends and uncalled capital. His study of investors during the episode does not support the view that this episode was fuelled by naive and irrational investors.