Skip to main content

The Economics of Lying

One of the lead articles in last week’s Economist argued that “lying is at the heart of civilisation” and “lying is one of the things that makes the world go round”.  Think about it for one minute.  If lying was socially acceptable and prevalent, would contracting and economic exchange be even possible?  Would the very fabric of society not crumble?  We could trust no one – the government, doctors, business, our parents, our professors, our friends, and even our nearest and dearest.  Sadly, the prevailing postmodern and relativistic culture in which we live believes that there is no such thing as truth.  You can watch Os Guinness argue for why we need “truth” by clicking here.

In the City of London, there was once a phrase “my word is my bond”.  People in the City could be trusted – social opprobrium (and even jail) would be the result of someone caught lying and cheating.  Maybe the tolerance of lying and dishonesty has been at the root of recent financial chicanery in the City.  It certainly has been at the root of voter cynicism in Western democracies.  Expediency and “being economical with the truth” is the order of the day for the modern politician.  

As an academic, I am interested in truth and academia is all about the pursuit of truth.  Consequently, I disagree with the Economist – lying is not at the heart of our civilisation, rather its pernicious influence is contributing to the decline of our civilisation!

Popular posts from this blog

Bitcoin Bubble?

According to Robert Shiller , speaking at Davos, Bitcoin is a perfect example of a bubble - story here . Shiller sees Bitcoin as a backwards step in the evolution of money.   George Selgin , a free banker, takes an opposing view - click here .  Although he doesn't believe that Bitcoin is money, he sees its development as a fascinating turn in the evolution of money. In particular, he lauds the fact that Bitcoin production is constrained and cannot be infinite. There is a short video below where Bitcoin explain how it works.

How Valuable Are Connections?

Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Amir Kermani, James Kwak and Todd Mitton have written a paper on whether firms connected to Timothy Geithner benefited from these connections. They do so by looking at how stocks of these firms reacted to the announcement that he was a nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008. They find that there were large abnormal returns for connected firms. Below is the paper's abstract and the full paper is available here . The announcement of Timothy Geithner as nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008 produced a cumulative abnormal return for financial firms with which he had a connection. This return was about 6% after the first full day of trading and about 12% after ten trading days. There were subsequently abnormal negative returns for connected firms when news broke that Geithner's confirmation might be derailed by tax issues. Excess returns for connected firms may reflect the perceived impact of relying on the advice of a small ne

Boom and Bust: A Global History of Financial Bubbles

Boom and Bust: A Global History of Financial Bubbles, co-authored with my colleague Will Quinn , is forthcoming in August. It is published by Cambridge University Press and is available for pre-order at Amazon , Barnes and Noble , Waterstones and Cambridge University Press .