Skip to main content

Who Invests during Bubbles?

Gareth Campbell and I have just had a paper entitled “Dispelling the Myth of the NaïveInvestor during the British Railway Mania, 1845-46” published in Business History Review.  In the article, we present extensive evidence that investors during the Railway Mania, recently described by the Economist as the greatest bubble in history, were not naïve or irrational.  Our paper is one of the first serious attempts to look at who invests during asset price bubbles.  Our paper, of course, raises questions as to whether investors during other bubble episodes were naïve, inexperienced, and irrational. 

Here is the abstract:
Anecdotal evidence from the British Railway Mania and other historical financial bubbles suggests that many investors during such episodes are naive, thus contributing to the asset price boom.  Using extensive investor records, we find that very few investors during the Railway Mania can be categorized as such.  Although some interpretations of the Mania  suggest that naive investors were expropriated by railway insiders, our evidence is inconsistent with this view, as railway insiders contributed substantial amounts of capital, and their investments performed no better than those made by other experienced investors. 
 

Popular posts from this blog

How Valuable Are Connections?

Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Amir Kermani, James Kwak and Todd Mitton have written a paper on whether firms connected to Timothy Geithner benefited from these connections. They do so by looking at how stocks of these firms reacted to the announcement that he was a nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008. They find that there were large abnormal returns for connected firms. Below is the paper's abstract and the full paper is available here . The announcement of Timothy Geithner as nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008 produced a cumulative abnormal return for financial firms with which he had a connection. This return was about 6% after the first full day of trading and about 12% after ten trading days. There were subsequently abnormal negative returns for connected firms when news broke that Geithner's confirmation might be derailed by tax issues. Excess returns for connected firms may reflect the perceived impact of relying on the advice of a small ne

Bitcoin Bubble?

According to Robert Shiller , speaking at Davos, Bitcoin is a perfect example of a bubble - story here . Shiller sees Bitcoin as a backwards step in the evolution of money.   George Selgin , a free banker, takes an opposing view - click here .  Although he doesn't believe that Bitcoin is money, he sees its development as a fascinating turn in the evolution of money. In particular, he lauds the fact that Bitcoin production is constrained and cannot be infinite. There is a short video below where Bitcoin explain how it works.

Boom and Bust: A Global History of Financial Bubbles

Boom and Bust: A Global History of Financial Bubbles, co-authored with my colleague Will Quinn , is forthcoming in August. It is published by Cambridge University Press and is available for pre-order at Amazon , Barnes and Noble , Waterstones and Cambridge University Press .